Friday, August 27, 2010

LOVE. . at First Sight ???

Posted: 27 Aug 2010 04:07 AM PDT
GAYTWOGETHER-100808-1w The poets speak of love at first sight. But can you really fall in love with someone you meet once? And if you do fall in love so soon, can you trust your feelings? Will they last?
Let me recap the debate that rages over this. Some say no. Love at first sight is mere animal lust masquerading as deep soul connection by those who need to justify their attraction. Why would anyone trust that? "It's a notion dreamed up by Hollywood romantics who like to air-brush the random happenstance of life until it looks like perfect, sweet destiny," says Californian Bill, 42. "Instant sparks and intense feelings are lust, or maybe puppy love. But they're not real love that comes from time, trust, and respect."
Others believe in the fate and romance of instant love. It happened to them, so it must be true. If love at first sight continues past the first year into the first decade, then who's to argue? "I met my boyfriend eight years ago and we fell in love instantly," says New Yorker Alan, 29. "Our meeting was fate. Our love hasn't changed, just grown."
Lovers may disagree, but what do the experts say? Can they help decode the mystery of what happens when you think you're falling in love with someone right off the bat (I call this the "Jerry-Maguire-you-had-me-at-hello" phenomenon)?
True love: Can it happen in half a second?
In his book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, Malcolm Gladwell presents evidence that humans have a built-in pre-rational ability to size people up instantaneously, which could lead to feelings of love. "When you meet someone for the first time, your mind takes about two seconds to jump to a series of conclusions," says Gladwell. He claims that "those instant conclusions that we reach are really powerful and really important and, occasionally, really good."GAYTWOGETHER-042208-ptt
What's more, some scientists support the theory that love at first sight is real. But they stop short of predicting relationship success based on initial reactions. Anthropologist Helen Fisher, Ph.D., author of Why We Love, studied the brain to understand what makes attraction such a fiery emotion. Her findings indicate that, just by a person seeing or meeting another, our human brains can experience a chemical reaction which may swiftly lead to romance. And Dr Lucy Brown, a neurologist at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York agrees with Dr. Fisher that love at first sight is a real phenomenon, but claims that other non-visual or chemical aspects of a person, such as mannerisms, voice, personality and social status, usually must come into play if lust is to evolve into love.
Letting the nay-sayers have their say...
So, if science supports love at first sight as a valid kickoff in the game of love, then why is there such objection to the notion? A few possible reasons include our tendencies to:
  • Feel gun shy--and with good reason. As the song goes, "Love hurts." The older we get, the more we experience disappointment in relationships. As a result, we become more cautious in our approach to love, and therefore, limited in how open we are to love at first sight. How can you trust something that once caused you pain?
  • 
  • Mistakenly equate love at first sight with successful long-term love. In Love at First Sight: The Stories and Science Behind Instant Attraction, author Earl Naumann, Ph.D., examined the possible psychological and biological explanations for love at first sight. He found that "love at first sight triggers" are shallow: physical appearance, personality traits and career potential are the top three. Since long-term relationships require compatibility, common interests and shared goals, love at first sight never guarantees love's longer-term success.
So while science doesn't yet have a definitive answer, maybe it's best to adopt the following attitude: "Understanding the brain remains one of the great scientific frontiers," says physics professor and USA Today science expert James Trefil. "And even though it may cost me my scientific union card to say so, if we never learn any more about love at first sight, it will be fine with me. Some things are just made to be enjoyed."
Maybe we should just treat love at first sight as a welcome hint. Give it a shot, whether it's an explosion of neurotransmitters or the undertow-like emotional pull of fate. Appreciate the feelings, which are a gift. But don't confuse the fast fire of love at first sight with the slow burning flame of a real relationship.
I never thought I'd quote Ronald Reagan, but his famous comment, "Trust, but verify," takes on a new meaning in this context. In romantic terms, it translates to "Believe with an open heart, but act with a cautious one."
Dave Singleton is the author of The MANdates: 25 Rules for Successful Gay Dating, and Behind Every Great Woman is a Fabulous Gay Man (Advice from a Guy Who Gives it to Y
Courtesy of Happen magazine, www.happenmag.com

Once again. . .many thanks to Michael @ gaytwogether.com

9 comments:

jimm said...

I'd have to believe in 'love at first sight.'

If i hit it off right away with someone, it's no accident. It isnt jus physical appearance, like tight firm nipples. :P No. It's their body language that churns me to butter. And I can sense their presence (my mystical powers at work, huh?).

seriously tho, it's like that pic you but up in the previous blog. His eyes light up, right? You can see into him. Or better said, you can 'read' him.

That's what i want in a mate. Someone whose aura brightens my life.

There is no 'on/off' switch for something like that.

Gary Kelly said...

I'm not sure I've experienced love at first sight... but it was certainly something at first sight. Infatuation maybe. But whatever it was, it blew me outta the water. I made it my business immediately to get to know that person. It became an obsession. And the relationship lasted about 10 years.

Jabacue said...

I knew the first time I met my husband that this was going to be 'it'. Can't explain it but something happened. Have a great story about this time.....will share sometime.
Justin, thanks for comment....so we all end up being an old threadbare, beat-up towel,eh?! LOL
Jim

JustinO'Shea said...

From my very limited years, still I'd have to say, Gary, there was love there!

I read a quip somewhere by some 'expert' that it takes a few minutes to fall in love. . . . . .and a life-time to get over it?

Do you think we ever totally "get over" someone we've been "in love with"?

I still wonder about my first crush Peter when we were 4 yrs old. . .do you too? Does he? ;-)
Then later on, much later on, the "magical Peter Pan" with who I used to "fly". . . and then Peter of Provincetown. . . . .;-)

Just wondering. . . .

justin

JustinO'Shea said...

JIM. . . .might be. . . might be. . .LOL

Coop said...

The trick, I think, is to differentiate "love" at first sight, with "lust" at first sight ;-)

Jimm is on to something with his comment on body language. Lust happens when I take a good look at someone and wish I had x-ray vision :)

sophie said...

my heart is still pounding everytime I see him and think of him...!

Gary Kelly said...

No, we never get over someone we've been "in love with" because it has a profound impact on our lives. In fact, it takes over our lives for whatever period it lasts.

I read somewhere that "love at first sight" is a process whereby we store information during our formative years. There's something we admire about an uncle, about a neighbor, about a stranger, about our mother, our father, about a friend at school, and on it goes.

And then one day, we see someone who makes sense of this jigsaw... who puts all the pieces together. And whammo! It's love at first sight.

Make sense to you?

By the way, I've got a serious thing about nostrils and I've never been able to figure out why.

And toes. But I'm not sure we should go there.

JustinO'Shea said...

GARY. . .YOU may go anywhere you wish. . . .lol

justin