http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/health/research/24aids.html?partner=rss&em
Gay men are not really the same as heterosexual men, right? We are specimens to be experimented with. . . .correct? Like 'less than human'. . . ..same category as " sex workers, drug users. ." ..deficient. . .right? Bull shit !
"If he had the money, Mr Sidibe of UNAIDS said, he would target high-risk groups like sex workers, gay men, drug users and uninfected people married to infected people."
Being Gay makes us automatically high-risk. . . ? WHY?
Advances in medicine, in HIV/AIDS prevention is wonderful. . . .but look at the words "they" use. . .
like the poor rats in their test cages and labyrinths. . . .
Gay men are not really the same as heterosexual men, right? We are specimens to be experimented with. . . .correct? Like 'less than human'. . . ..same category as " sex workers, drug users. ." ..deficient. . .right? Bull shit !
"If he had the money, Mr Sidibe of UNAIDS said, he would target high-risk groups like sex workers, gay men, drug users and uninfected people married to infected people."
Being Gay makes us automatically high-risk. . . ? WHY?
Advances in medicine, in HIV/AIDS prevention is wonderful. . . .but look at the words "they" use. . .
like the poor rats in their test cages and labyrinths. . . .
justin o'shea
No comments:
Post a Comment